Shopping on line can be easy, simple and save you lots of money. It can also take a lot of your time, frustrate you, and result in unwanted purchases. Now the same can be said for regular high street shopping, but with the vast opportunity presented by the Internet it will pay you to spend a few minutes reading this and understanding how to better optimize your Australian Senate shopping experience:

1. Compare - without doubt the biggest advantage that the Australian Senate offers shoppers today is the ability to compare thousands of Australian Senate at a time. This is a great thing, but not necessarily all the time! Too much can be daunting at times so take advantage of the great comparison sites and where possible let them do the hard work for you.

2. Research - if it has been said it will be on the internet. Ignorance is no longer a justifiable reason for buying the wrong thing. Take the time to research in detail everything that you could possible want to know about

3. Testimonials - don't know anybody that has bought a Australian Senate? Wrong! If the Australian Senate is good the internet will let you know. Use the Internet as a friend and get testimonials before you buy.

4. Questions - Got a question about Australian Senate then search the Forums, FAQ's, Blogs etc. Don't be afraid to ask .....

5. Reputation - Never heard of the company selling Australian Senate? Don't worry, no reason why you should know every company in the world, but you know someone that does! Use the internet to find out what people are saying about Australian Senate and build up a picture of their reputation for sales, returns, customer service, delivery etc.

6. Returns - still worried that even after all of the above your Australian Senate wont be what you want? Check out the returns policy. There is so much competition now that someone, somewhere is bound to offer the terms that you are comfortable with.

7. Feedback - happy with your Australian Senate then let people know, after all you are depending on others people input in your buying decision, so why not give a little back.

8. Security - check for the yellow padlock on the Australian Senate site before you buy, and the s after http:/ /i.e. https:// = a secure site

9. Contact - got a question about Australian Senate, or want to leave a comment then check out the sites contact page. Reputable companies have them and respond.

10. Payment - ready to pay for your Australian Senate, then use your credit card or PayPal! Be aware of companies that don't accept them, there may be genuine reasons but given the huge amount of choice you have when buying online there is no reason at all not to buy via credit card or PayPal.

{{Infobox Legislature| name = Australian Senate | coa_pic = | coa-pic = | session_room = Senate, Parliament House, Canberra.JPG | house_type = Upper house | leader1_type = [President of the Australian Senate | leader1 = [Alan Ferguson | party1 = [Liberal Party of Australia | election1 = 14 August, [ | leader2_type = | leader2 = | party2 = | election2 = | members = 76 | p_groups = [Coalition (Australia) (39)
[Australian Labor Party (28)
[Australian Greens (4)
[Australian Democrats (4)
[Family First Party (1) | election3 = 9 October [ | meeting_place = [Parliament House, Canberra, [Canberra, [Australian Capital Territory | website = http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/index.htm Senate -->

The Senate is the upper house of the two houses of the Parliament of Australia. The lower house is known as the Australian House of Representatives.

Origins and role The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act of 1900 established the Senate as part of the new system of dominion government in newly-federated Australia. From a comparative governmental perspective, the Australian Senate exhibits distinctive characteristics, in that unlike upper houses in other Westminster system governments, the Senate is not a vestigial body with limited legislative power, but rather it was intended to play, and does play, an active role in legislation. Rather than being modelled after the House of Lords, as the Canadian Senate was, the Australian Senate was in part modelled after the United States Senate, by giving equal representation to each state. The Constitution intended to give less populous states added voice in a Federal legislature, while also providing for the revising role of an upper house in the Westminster system.

Although the Prime Minister of Australia, by convention, serves as a member of the Australian House of Representatives, other ministers may come from either house, and the two houses have almost equal legislative power. As with most upper chambers in bicameral parliaments, the Senate cannot introduce Appropriation Bills (bills that authorise government expenditure of public revenue) or impose taxation, that role being reserved for the lower chamber. That degree of equality between the Australian Senate and House of Representatives is in part due to the age of the Australian constitution - it was enacted before the confrontation in 1909 in United Kingdom between the United Kingdom House of Commons and the House of Lords, which ultimately resulted in the restrictions placed on the powers of the House of Lords by the Parliament Act - but also reflected the desire of the Constitution's authors to have the upper house act as a 'stabilising' influence on the expression of popular democracy (much as the colonial Legislative Councils functioned as at the time). The smaller states also desired strong powers for the Senate as a way of ensuring that the interests of more populous states as represented in the House of Representatives did not totally dominate the government.

In practice, however, most legislation (except for "Private Member's Bills") in the Australian Parliament is initiated by the Government, which has control over the lower house. It is then passed to the Senate, which may amend the bill or refuse to pass it. In the majority of cases, voting takes place along Party line (politics), although there are occasional conscience votes.

Where the houses disagree There are detailed conventions and rules regarding situations in which the Senate and the House of Representatives disagree. If the Senate repeatedly refuses to pass legislation initiated in the lower house, the Government may either abandon the bill, continue to revise it, or call a Australian electoral system#Double Dissolutions (election for both houses of Parliament) and attempt to pass the bill at a subsequent Joint Sitting, Australian parliament, 1974 of the two houses.

On 8 October 2003, the Prime Minister John Howard initiated public discussion of whether the mechanism for the resolution of deadlocks between the houses should be reformed. High levels of support for the existing mechanism, and a very low level of public interest in that discussion, resulted in the abandonment of these proposals.Consultative Group on Constitutional Change, Resolving Deadlocks: The Public Response, March 2004 http://www.dpmc.gov.au/conschange/report/docs/report.pdf

Blocking Supply The constitutional text denies the Senate the power to originate or amend appropriation bills, in deference to the conventions of the classical Westminster system, under which the executive branch government is responsible for its use of public funds to the lower house, which has the power to bring down a government by Loss of Supply - i.e. revenue appropriated through taxation. The arrangement as expressed in the Australian Constitution, however, still leaves the Senate with the power to reject supply bills or defer their passage - undoubtedly one of the Senate's most contentious and most powerful abilities.

The ability to block Supply was the origin of Australia's most significant constitutional crisis, Australian constitutional crisis of 1975. The Opposition (parliamentary) used its numbers in the Senate to defer supply bills, refusing to deal with them until an election was called for both Houses of Parliament, an election which it hoped to win. The Prime Minister of Australia of the day, Gough Whitlam, contested the legitimacy of the blocking and refused to resign. The crisis brought to a head two Westminster conventions that, under the Australian constitutional system, were in conflict - firstly, that a government may continue to govern for as long as it has the support of the lower house, and secondly, that a government that no longer has access to Supply must either resign or be dismissed. The crisis was resolved in November 1975 when Governor-General John Kerr dismissed Whitlam's government and appointed a caretaker government on condition that elections for both houses of parliament be held. This action in itself was a source of controversy and debate continues on the proper usage of the Senate's ability to block Supply and on whether such a power should even exist.

The membership of the Senate Under the Constitution, the Senate must:

These conditions have periodically been the source of debate, and within these conditions, the composition and rules of the Senate have varied significantly since federation.

Voting system The voting system for the Senate has changed twice since it was created. The original arrangement involved a First Past the Post electoral system block voting mechanism. In 1919 preferential block voting came in. Block voting tended to grant landslide majorities and even "wipe-outs" very easily. In 1946, the Australian Labor Party government won 33 out of the 36 Senate seats. In 1948, partially in response to this extreme situation, proportional representation became the method for electing the Senate.

Senate Ballot Paper The Australian Senate voting paper under the single transferable vote system resembles this example, which shows the candidates for Tasmanian senate representation in the Australian federal election, 2004.

{| border="1" cellspacing="0" align=center cellpadding="5" style="font-size:85%; border-collapse:collapse;"|-| colspan=10 bgcolor="#cccccc" align=center | Senate election - Tasmania|- valign=top|| A
Liberal Party of Australia || B
Citizens Electoral Council || C
Australian Democrats || D
Family First ] || F
Ind. || G
||H
Australian Greens || I
Australian Labor Party ||
Ungrouped|- valign=top|| Eric Abetz
Guy Barnett (Australian politician)
Parry S
|| Larner R
Watts A
|| Onsman Y
Cass S
|| Petrusma J
Bergman L
Smith L
|| Mitchell D
Fracalossi M
|| Murphy S
|| Martin S
Newman J
|| Christine Milne
Cassidy K
Millen T
|| O'Brien K
Polley H
Price D
Wells N
|| Newitt R
Gargan E
Ottavi D
McDonald J
|}

Electors must either:

Because each state elects 6 senators at each half-senate election, the quota for election is only 14.3% (33.3% for territories). As a result, some states have upwards of 70 candidates on their ballot papers, and the voter must individually number every single candidate for a "below the line" vote to count. As a result the "above the line" system was implemented. Over 95% of electors vote "above the line".

Note that the ungrouped candidates in the far right column do not have a box above the line. Therefore they can only get a primary (number 1) vote from electors who vote below the line. For this reason, some independents register as a group, either with other independents or by themselves, such as groups F and G in the above example.

Size The size of the Senate has changed over the years. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act requires that the number of Senators approximate as nearly as possible to half of the number of members of the House of Representatives, and it has therefore grown periodically.The Constitution originally provided for six Senators for each state, and thus a total of 36 senators. This was increased to ten Senators per state (and a total of 60) in 1948. In 1975, the two territories, the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory, elected 2 Senators each for the first time, bringing the number to 64. The last expansion took place in 1984, under which the number of senators from each state increased from 10 to 12, and the entire Senate to 76.Department of the Senate, Senate Brief No. 1, 'Electing Australia’s Senators', retrieved August 2007 The Senators from the Northern Territory also represent constituents from Australia's Indian Ocean Territories (Christmas Island and the Cocos (Keeling) Islands), while the Senators from the Australian Capital Territory also represent voters from the Jervis Bay Territory.

Normally, half of the Senate is contested at each election, for terms of up to six years, but during a Australian electoral system#Double Dissolutions, every seat faces re-election. Senators from the territories only serve half-terms, and must stand for re-election every three years. Unlike the House of Representatives, Senators serve fixed terms which expire on the 30th of June every three years. Thus, while the voters elect Senators at the same time as lower house members, such Senators' term of office does not begin until the 1st of July following their election. As a result, the new Parliament will often sit for some time with the old, lame duck (politics) Senate.

The "Unrepresentative" House As a body intended to provide greater representation to smaller states, the Senate (like many upper houses) is necessarily relatively unrepresentative; Tasmania, with a population of 450,000, elects the same number of Senators as New South Wales, which has a population of 6 million. On November 4, 1992, Prime Minister Paul Keating called it an "unrepresentative swill". Question without Notice: Loan Council Arrangements House Hansard, But the proportional election system within each state ensures that Senate incorporates much more political diversity than the lower house, which is basically a Two-party system body. Consequently, the Senate frequently functions as a Upper house, intended not to match party political strength in the lower chamber but to bring in different people, in terms of geography, age and interests, who can contribute in a less politicised manner to the process of legislative enactment.

Parties in the Australian Senate Parties which currently have representation in the Senate:

Parties which have held Senate seats in the past include the Democratic Labor Party, Liberal Movement, One Nation Party and the Nuclear Disarmament Party.

Due to the need to obtain votes state-wide, independent candidates have difficulty getting elected. The one exception in recent times was the Tasmanian Brian Harradine.

The Australian Senate serves as a model for some politicians in Canada, particularly in the Western provinces, who wish to reform the Canadian Senate to take a more active legislative role.

See also: Australian House of Representatives, List of longest-serving members of the Australian Senate

Latest result Party composition Historical {| border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" style="font-size:95%; border-collapse:collapse;"|-||Year|| Total||Australian Labor Party||Coalition (Australia)||Australian Democrats||Australian Greens||Other|-||1974-1975|| 60|| 29|| 29|| || ||2 (Michael Townley (Australian politician), 1 Liberal Movement)|-||1975-1978|| 64|| 27|| 35|| || ||2 (Brian Harradine, 1 Liberal Movement)|-||1978-1981|| 64|| 26|| 35|| 2|| ||1 (Harradine)|-||1981-1983|| 64|| 27|| 31|| 5|| ||1 (Harradine)|-||1983|| 64|| 30|| 28|| 5|| ||1 (Harradine)|-||1984|| 76|| 34|| 33|| 7|| ||2 (Harradine, 1 Nuclear Disarmament Party)|-||1987-1990|| 76|| 32|| 34|| 7|| ||3 (Harradine, Jo Vallentine, 1 NDP)|-||1990-1993|| 76|| 32|| 34|| 8|| 1||1 (Harradine)|-||1993-1996|| 76|| 30|| 36|| 7|| 2||1 (Harradine)|-||1996-1999|| 76|| 28|| 37|| 7|| 2||2 (Harradine, Mal Colston )|-||1999-2002|| 76|| 29|| 35|| 9|| 1||2 (Harradine, 1 One Nation (Australia))|-||2002-2005|| 76|| 29|| 35|| 8|| 2||2 (Harradine, 1 One Nation)|-||2005-2008|| 76|| 28|| 39|| 4|| 4||1 (Family First)|}

This table has been simplified in the following ways:

Current The 2004 election saw a significant change in the composition of the Senate, which began on 1 July 2005. This was the first time since 1981 that the government in the House of Representatives also had a majority of the seats in the Senate.

{] || 16 || 17 || 1 || 34|-|| National Party of Australia || 2 || 2 || 0 || 4|-|| Country Liberal Party ] || 12 || 14 || 2 || 28|-|| Australian Democrats ] || 2 || 2 || 0 || 4|-|| Family First || 0 || 1 || 0 || 1|-|| Total || 36 || 36 || 4 || 76|}

This government majority meant that, for the first time in a generation, a government did not generally have to negotiate with other political parties if it wanted to secure passage of legislation through parliament.

The Senate in practice The work of the Senate The Australian Senate typically sits for 50 to 60 days a year.Figures are available for each year on the Senate StatsNet http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/work/statistics/index.htm Most of those days are grouped into 'sitting fortnights' of two four-day weeks. These are in turn arranged in three periods: the autumn sittings, from February to April; the winter sittings, which commence with the delivery of the budget in the House of Representatives on the first sitting day of May and run through to June or July; and the spring sittings, which commence around August and continue until December, and which typically contain the largest number of the year's sitting days.

In addition to the work of the main chamber, the Senate also has a large number of Australian Senate committees which deal with matters referred to them by the Senate. These committees also conduct hearings three times a year in which the government's budget and operations are examined. These are known as estimates hearings. Traditionally dominated by scrutiny of government activities by non-government senators, they provide the opportunity for all senators to ask questions of ministers and public officials.

The senate has a regular schedule that structures its typical working week.Department of the Senate website, Senate weekly routine of business http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/work/routineofbus.htm

Holding governments to account One of the functions of the Senate, both directly and through its Australian Senate committees, is to scrutinise government activity. The vigour of this scrutiny has been fuelled for many years by the different party composition of the two houses. When the Howard government won control of the Senate in 2005, it sparked a debate about the effectiveness of the Senate in holding the government of the day accountable for its actions. Government members have argued that the Senate continues to be a forum of vigorous debate, and its committees continue to be active.Senator the Hon Nick Minchin media release, 30 June 2006 http://www.financeminister.gov.au/media/2006/mr_432006.html The Opposition leader in the Senate has suggested that the government has attenuated the scrutinising activities of the Senate.Senator Chris Evans, The tyranny of the majority (speech), 10 November 2005 http://www.chrisevans.alp.org.au/news/1105/senatespeeches10-01.php The Australian Democrats, a minor party which has frequently played mediating and negotiating roles in the Senate, have expressed concern about a diminished role for the Senate's committees.Australian Democrats media release, 4 July 2006 http://www.democrats.org.au/docs/2006/PR_Senate_Attack_Accountability.pdf

Votes in the Senate Senators are called upon to vote on matters before the Senate. These votes are called divisions in the case of Senate business, or ballots where the vote is to choose a Senator to fill an office of the Senate (such as President of the Australian Senate).Senate Standing Orders, numbers 7, 10, 98-105, 163

Party discipline in Politics of Australia is extremely tight, so divisions almost always are decided on party lines. Nevertheless, the existence of minor parties holding the balance of power in the Senate has made divisions in that chamber more important and occasionally dramatic than in the House of Representatives.

When a division is to be held, bells ring throughout the parliament building for four minutes, during which time Senators must go to the chamber. At the end of that period the doors are locked and a vote is taken, by identifying and counting senators according to the side of the chamber on which they sit (ayes to the right of the chair, noes to the left). The whole procedure takes around eight minutes. Senators with commitments that keep from the chamber may make arrangements in advance to be 'paired' with a senator of the opposite political party, so that their absence does not affect the outcome of the vote.

The senate contains an even number of Senators, so a tied vote is a real prospect (which regularly occurs when the party numbers in the chamber are finely balanced). Section 23 of the Constitution requires that in the event of a tied division, the question is resolved in the negative. The system is however different for ballots for offices such as the President. If such a ballot is tied, the Clerk of the Australian Senate decides the outcome by the drawing of lots. In reality, conventions govern most ballots, so this situation does not arise.

Crossing the floor One feature of the government having a majority in both chambers since 1 July 2005 has been an increased emphasis on internal differences between members of the government parties. This period has seen the first instances of crossing the floor by Senators since the conservative government took office in 1996. Recent cases of government members crossing the floor to vote with the Opposition have included Senator Gary Humphries on civil unions in the Australian Capital Territory, and Barnaby Joyce on voluntary student unionism. Neither of these instances resulted in the defeat of a government proposal, as in both cases Senator Steve Fielding voted with the government. A more significant potential instance of floor crossing was averted when the government withdrew its Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill, of which several government Senators had been critical, and which would have been defeated had it proceeded to the vote.Prime Minister's press conference, 14 August 2006 http://www.pm.gov.au/news/interviews/Interview2073.html

See also

References

Further reading

External links

{{Infobox Legislature| name = Australian Senate | coa_pic = | coa-pic = | session_room = Senate, Parliament House, Canberra.JPG | house_type = Upper house | leader1_type = [President of the Australian Senate | leader1 = [Alan Ferguson | party1 = [Liberal Party of Australia | election1 = 14 August, [ | leader2_type = | leader2 = | party2 = | election2 = | members = 76 | p_groups = [Coalition (Australia) (39)
[Australian Labor Party (28)
[Australian Greens (4)
[Australian Democrats (4)
[Family First Party (1) | election3 = 9 October [ | meeting_place = [Parliament House, Canberra, [Canberra, [Australian Capital Territory | website = http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/index.htm Senate -->

The Senate is the upper house of the two houses of the Parliament of Australia. The lower house is known as the Australian House of Representatives.

Origins and role The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act of 1900 established the Senate as part of the new system of dominion government in newly-federated Australia. From a comparative governmental perspective, the Australian Senate exhibits distinctive characteristics, in that unlike upper houses in other Westminster system governments, the Senate is not a vestigial body with limited legislative power, but rather it was intended to play, and does play, an active role in legislation. Rather than being modelled after the House of Lords, as the Canadian Senate was, the Australian Senate was in part modelled after the United States Senate, by giving equal representation to each state. The Constitution intended to give less populous states added voice in a Federal legislature, while also providing for the revising role of an upper house in the Westminster system.

Although the Prime Minister of Australia, by convention, serves as a member of the Australian House of Representatives, other ministers may come from either house, and the two houses have almost equal legislative power. As with most upper chambers in bicameral parliaments, the Senate cannot introduce Appropriation Bills (bills that authorise government expenditure of public revenue) or impose taxation, that role being reserved for the lower chamber. That degree of equality between the Australian Senate and House of Representatives is in part due to the age of the Australian constitution - it was enacted before the confrontation in 1909 in United Kingdom between the United Kingdom House of Commons and the House of Lords, which ultimately resulted in the restrictions placed on the powers of the House of Lords by the Parliament Act - but also reflected the desire of the Constitution's authors to have the upper house act as a 'stabilising' influence on the expression of popular democracy (much as the colonial Legislative Councils functioned as at the time). The smaller states also desired strong powers for the Senate as a way of ensuring that the interests of more populous states as represented in the House of Representatives did not totally dominate the government.

In practice, however, most legislation (except for "Private Member's Bills") in the Australian Parliament is initiated by the Government, which has control over the lower house. It is then passed to the Senate, which may amend the bill or refuse to pass it. In the majority of cases, voting takes place along Party line (politics), although there are occasional conscience votes.

Where the houses disagree There are detailed conventions and rules regarding situations in which the Senate and the House of Representatives disagree. If the Senate repeatedly refuses to pass legislation initiated in the lower house, the Government may either abandon the bill, continue to revise it, or call a Australian electoral system#Double Dissolutions (election for both houses of Parliament) and attempt to pass the bill at a subsequent Joint Sitting, Australian parliament, 1974 of the two houses.

On 8 October 2003, the Prime Minister John Howard initiated public discussion of whether the mechanism for the resolution of deadlocks between the houses should be reformed. High levels of support for the existing mechanism, and a very low level of public interest in that discussion, resulted in the abandonment of these proposals.Consultative Group on Constitutional Change, Resolving Deadlocks: The Public Response, March 2004 http://www.dpmc.gov.au/conschange/report/docs/report.pdf

Blocking Supply The constitutional text denies the Senate the power to originate or amend appropriation bills, in deference to the conventions of the classical Westminster system, under which the executive branch government is responsible for its use of public funds to the lower house, which has the power to bring down a government by Loss of Supply - i.e. revenue appropriated through taxation. The arrangement as expressed in the Australian Constitution, however, still leaves the Senate with the power to reject supply bills or defer their passage - undoubtedly one of the Senate's most contentious and most powerful abilities.

The ability to block Supply was the origin of Australia's most significant constitutional crisis, Australian constitutional crisis of 1975. The Opposition (parliamentary) used its numbers in the Senate to defer supply bills, refusing to deal with them until an election was called for both Houses of Parliament, an election which it hoped to win. The Prime Minister of Australia of the day, Gough Whitlam, contested the legitimacy of the blocking and refused to resign. The crisis brought to a head two Westminster conventions that, under the Australian constitutional system, were in conflict - firstly, that a government may continue to govern for as long as it has the support of the lower house, and secondly, that a government that no longer has access to Supply must either resign or be dismissed. The crisis was resolved in November 1975 when Governor-General John Kerr dismissed Whitlam's government and appointed a caretaker government on condition that elections for both houses of parliament be held. This action in itself was a source of controversy and debate continues on the proper usage of the Senate's ability to block Supply and on whether such a power should even exist.

The membership of the Senate Under the Constitution, the Senate must:

These conditions have periodically been the source of debate, and within these conditions, the composition and rules of the Senate have varied significantly since federation.

Voting system The voting system for the Senate has changed twice since it was created. The original arrangement involved a First Past the Post electoral system block voting mechanism. In 1919 preferential block voting came in. Block voting tended to grant landslide majorities and even "wipe-outs" very easily. In 1946, the Australian Labor Party government won 33 out of the 36 Senate seats. In 1948, partially in response to this extreme situation, proportional representation became the method for electing the Senate.

Senate Ballot Paper The Australian Senate voting paper under the single transferable vote system resembles this example, which shows the candidates for Tasmanian senate representation in the Australian federal election, 2004.

{| border="1" cellspacing="0" align=center cellpadding="5" style="font-size:85%; border-collapse:collapse;"|-| colspan=10 bgcolor="#cccccc" align=center | Senate election - Tasmania|- valign=top|| A
Liberal Party of Australia || B
Citizens Electoral Council || C
Australian Democrats || D
Family First ] || F
Ind. || G
||H
Australian Greens || I
Australian Labor Party ||
Ungrouped|- valign=top|| Eric Abetz
Guy Barnett (Australian politician)
Parry S
|| Larner R
Watts A
|| Onsman Y
Cass S
|| Petrusma J
Bergman L
Smith L
|| Mitchell D
Fracalossi M
|| Murphy S
|| Martin S
Newman J
|| Christine Milne
Cassidy K
Millen T
|| O'Brien K
Polley H
Price D
Wells N
|| Newitt R
Gargan E
Ottavi D
McDonald J
|}

Electors must either:

Because each state elects 6 senators at each half-senate election, the quota for election is only 14.3% (33.3% for territories). As a result, some states have upwards of 70 candidates on their ballot papers, and the voter must individually number every single candidate for a "below the line" vote to count. As a result the "above the line" system was implemented. Over 95% of electors vote "above the line".

Note that the ungrouped candidates in the far right column do not have a box above the line. Therefore they can only get a primary (number 1) vote from electors who vote below the line. For this reason, some independents register as a group, either with other independents or by themselves, such as groups F and G in the above example.

Size The size of the Senate has changed over the years. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act requires that the number of Senators approximate as nearly as possible to half of the number of members of the House of Representatives, and it has therefore grown periodically.The Constitution originally provided for six Senators for each state, and thus a total of 36 senators. This was increased to ten Senators per state (and a total of 60) in 1948. In 1975, the two territories, the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory, elected 2 Senators each for the first time, bringing the number to 64. The last expansion took place in 1984, under which the number of senators from each state increased from 10 to 12, and the entire Senate to 76.Department of the Senate, Senate Brief No. 1, 'Electing Australia’s Senators', retrieved August 2007 The Senators from the Northern Territory also represent constituents from Australia's Indian Ocean Territories (Christmas Island and the Cocos (Keeling) Islands), while the Senators from the Australian Capital Territory also represent voters from the Jervis Bay Territory.

Normally, half of the Senate is contested at each election, for terms of up to six years, but during a Australian electoral system#Double Dissolutions, every seat faces re-election. Senators from the territories only serve half-terms, and must stand for re-election every three years. Unlike the House of Representatives, Senators serve fixed terms which expire on the 30th of June every three years. Thus, while the voters elect Senators at the same time as lower house members, such Senators' term of office does not begin until the 1st of July following their election. As a result, the new Parliament will often sit for some time with the old, lame duck (politics) Senate.

The "Unrepresentative" House As a body intended to provide greater representation to smaller states, the Senate (like many upper houses) is necessarily relatively unrepresentative; Tasmania, with a population of 450,000, elects the same number of Senators as New South Wales, which has a population of 6 million. On November 4, 1992, Prime Minister Paul Keating called it an "unrepresentative swill". Question without Notice: Loan Council Arrangements House Hansard, But the proportional election system within each state ensures that Senate incorporates much more political diversity than the lower house, which is basically a Two-party system body. Consequently, the Senate frequently functions as a Upper house, intended not to match party political strength in the lower chamber but to bring in different people, in terms of geography, age and interests, who can contribute in a less politicised manner to the process of legislative enactment.

Parties in the Australian Senate Parties which currently have representation in the Senate:

Parties which have held Senate seats in the past include the Democratic Labor Party, Liberal Movement, One Nation Party and the Nuclear Disarmament Party.

Due to the need to obtain votes state-wide, independent candidates have difficulty getting elected. The one exception in recent times was the Tasmanian Brian Harradine.

The Australian Senate serves as a model for some politicians in Canada, particularly in the Western provinces, who wish to reform the Canadian Senate to take a more active legislative role.

See also: Australian House of Representatives, List of longest-serving members of the Australian Senate

Latest result Party composition Historical {| border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" style="font-size:95%; border-collapse:collapse;"|-||Year|| Total||Australian Labor Party||Coalition (Australia)||Australian Democrats||Australian Greens||Other|-||1974-1975|| 60|| 29|| 29|| || ||2 (Michael Townley (Australian politician), 1 Liberal Movement)|-||1975-1978|| 64|| 27|| 35|| || ||2 (Brian Harradine, 1 Liberal Movement)|-||1978-1981|| 64|| 26|| 35|| 2|| ||1 (Harradine)|-||1981-1983|| 64|| 27|| 31|| 5|| ||1 (Harradine)|-||1983|| 64|| 30|| 28|| 5|| ||1 (Harradine)|-||1984|| 76|| 34|| 33|| 7|| ||2 (Harradine, 1 Nuclear Disarmament Party)|-||1987-1990|| 76|| 32|| 34|| 7|| ||3 (Harradine, Jo Vallentine, 1 NDP)|-||1990-1993|| 76|| 32|| 34|| 8|| 1||1 (Harradine)|-||1993-1996|| 76|| 30|| 36|| 7|| 2||1 (Harradine)|-||1996-1999|| 76|| 28|| 37|| 7|| 2||2 (Harradine, Mal Colston )|-||1999-2002|| 76|| 29|| 35|| 9|| 1||2 (Harradine, 1 One Nation (Australia))|-||2002-2005|| 76|| 29|| 35|| 8|| 2||2 (Harradine, 1 One Nation)|-||2005-2008|| 76|| 28|| 39|| 4|| 4||1 (Family First)|}

This table has been simplified in the following ways:

Current The 2004 election saw a significant change in the composition of the Senate, which began on 1 July 2005. This was the first time since 1981 that the government in the House of Representatives also had a majority of the seats in the Senate.

{] || 16 || 17 || 1 || 34|-|| National Party of Australia || 2 || 2 || 0 || 4|-|| Country Liberal Party ] || 12 || 14 || 2 || 28|-|| Australian Democrats ] || 2 || 2 || 0 || 4|-|| Family First || 0 || 1 || 0 || 1|-|| Total || 36 || 36 || 4 || 76|}

This government majority meant that, for the first time in a generation, a government did not generally have to negotiate with other political parties if it wanted to secure passage of legislation through parliament.

The Senate in practice The work of the Senate The Australian Senate typically sits for 50 to 60 days a year.Figures are available for each year on the Senate StatsNet http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/work/statistics/index.htm Most of those days are grouped into 'sitting fortnights' of two four-day weeks. These are in turn arranged in three periods: the autumn sittings, from February to April; the winter sittings, which commence with the delivery of the budget in the House of Representatives on the first sitting day of May and run through to June or July; and the spring sittings, which commence around August and continue until December, and which typically contain the largest number of the year's sitting days.

In addition to the work of the main chamber, the Senate also has a large number of Australian Senate committees which deal with matters referred to them by the Senate. These committees also conduct hearings three times a year in which the government's budget and operations are examined. These are known as estimates hearings. Traditionally dominated by scrutiny of government activities by non-government senators, they provide the opportunity for all senators to ask questions of ministers and public officials.

The senate has a regular schedule that structures its typical working week.Department of the Senate website, Senate weekly routine of business http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/work/routineofbus.htm

Holding governments to account One of the functions of the Senate, both directly and through its Australian Senate committees, is to scrutinise government activity. The vigour of this scrutiny has been fuelled for many years by the different party composition of the two houses. When the Howard government won control of the Senate in 2005, it sparked a debate about the effectiveness of the Senate in holding the government of the day accountable for its actions. Government members have argued that the Senate continues to be a forum of vigorous debate, and its committees continue to be active.Senator the Hon Nick Minchin media release, 30 June 2006 http://www.financeminister.gov.au/media/2006/mr_432006.html The Opposition leader in the Senate has suggested that the government has attenuated the scrutinising activities of the Senate.Senator Chris Evans, The tyranny of the majority (speech), 10 November 2005 http://www.chrisevans.alp.org.au/news/1105/senatespeeches10-01.php The Australian Democrats, a minor party which has frequently played mediating and negotiating roles in the Senate, have expressed concern about a diminished role for the Senate's committees.Australian Democrats media release, 4 July 2006 http://www.democrats.org.au/docs/2006/PR_Senate_Attack_Accountability.pdf

Votes in the Senate Senators are called upon to vote on matters before the Senate. These votes are called divisions in the case of Senate business, or ballots where the vote is to choose a Senator to fill an office of the Senate (such as President of the Australian Senate).Senate Standing Orders, numbers 7, 10, 98-105, 163

Party discipline in Politics of Australia is extremely tight, so divisions almost always are decided on party lines. Nevertheless, the existence of minor parties holding the balance of power in the Senate has made divisions in that chamber more important and occasionally dramatic than in the House of Representatives.

When a division is to be held, bells ring throughout the parliament building for four minutes, during which time Senators must go to the chamber. At the end of that period the doors are locked and a vote is taken, by identifying and counting senators according to the side of the chamber on which they sit (ayes to the right of the chair, noes to the left). The whole procedure takes around eight minutes. Senators with commitments that keep from the chamber may make arrangements in advance to be 'paired' with a senator of the opposite political party, so that their absence does not affect the outcome of the vote.

The senate contains an even number of Senators, so a tied vote is a real prospect (which regularly occurs when the party numbers in the chamber are finely balanced). Section 23 of the Constitution requires that in the event of a tied division, the question is resolved in the negative. The system is however different for ballots for offices such as the President. If such a ballot is tied, the Clerk of the Australian Senate decides the outcome by the drawing of lots. In reality, conventions govern most ballots, so this situation does not arise.

Crossing the floor One feature of the government having a majority in both chambers since 1 July 2005 has been an increased emphasis on internal differences between members of the government parties. This period has seen the first instances of crossing the floor by Senators since the conservative government took office in 1996. Recent cases of government members crossing the floor to vote with the Opposition have included Senator Gary Humphries on civil unions in the Australian Capital Territory, and Barnaby Joyce on voluntary student unionism. Neither of these instances resulted in the defeat of a government proposal, as in both cases Senator Steve Fielding voted with the government. A more significant potential instance of floor crossing was averted when the government withdrew its Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill, of which several government Senators had been critical, and which would have been defeated had it proceeded to the vote.Prime Minister's press conference, 14 August 2006 http://www.pm.gov.au/news/interviews/Interview2073.html

See also

References

Further reading

External links



Australian Senate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Senate is the upper of the two houses of the Parliament of Australia. The lower house is known as the House of Representatives. Senators, popularly elected under a system of ...

Australian Senate election, 1970 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Half-senate elections were held in Australia on 21 November 1970.

Australian Senate delays gay equality legislation - from Pink News ...
Australian Senate delays gay equality legislation - all the latest gay news from the UK and beyond to the gay community

Parliament of Australia: Department of the Senate: Homepage
Welcome to Australia's Senate. This website provides information on the Australian Senate, Senators, Senate committees and Publications. It also provides information and ...

Australian Senate Rejects Wiretap Amendment
The Australian Senate voted on 28 June to reject the Telecommunications Interception Legislation Amendment Bill 2002.

Australian Senate Reviews Interception Bill
The Australian Senate Legal and Constitutional Legislative Committee released its review of the Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment Bill 2004. The bill extends the ...

BBC NEWS | World | Asia-Pacific | Australian PM censured over Iraq
Australia's Senate passes an historic no-confidence motion against the prime minister over his handling of the crisis in Iraq.

BBC NEWS | Business | Senate rejects Telstra sell-off
Australia's upper house torpedoes the privatisation of the main telecoms firm, in a move calculated to provoke early elections.

Australian senate passes new immigration legislation
New immigration legislation designed to strengthen Australian security passed the Senate on 25 February 2007. The House of Representatives passed the legislation in November.

[casi] Australian Senate passes Iraq no confidence motion
The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. Views expressed in this archived message are those of the ...

 

Australian Senate



 
Copyright © 2008 Hintcenter.com - All rights reserved.
Home | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
All Trademarks belong to their repective owners. Many aspects of this page are used under
commercial commons license from Yahoo!